A Different Role


BS”D
Volume 39, No. 29
19 Iyar 5785
May 17, 2025
Much of Parashat Emor is devoted to laws applicable only to Kohanim, as the Parashah begins (21:1), “Say to the Kohanim, the sons of Aharon, and tell them . . .” R’ Shaul Yisraeli z”l (1909-1995; rabbi of Kfar Ha’roeh, Israel, and a Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivat Mercaz Harav) writes: In last week’s Parashah, the Torah directed the entire nation toward purity and holiness, as we read (19:2), “Speak to the entire assembly of Bnei Yisrael and say to them, ‘You shall be holy, for holy am I, Hashem, your Elokim.” Nevertheless, Kohanim have more laws and are directed to be more pure and more holy, as we read (21:6), “They shall be holy to their Elokim and they shall not desecrate the Name of their Elokim–for the fire-offerings of Hashem, the food of their Elokim, they offer, so they must remain holy.” The very nature of Judaism, R’ Yisraeli explains, involves making distinctions and separations: The Jewish People are holy, and Kohanim are holier. Likewise, the Jewish People are meant to be distinct from the nations of the world, as we read in last week’s Parashah (20:26), “You shall be holy for Me, for I Hashem am holy, and I have separated you from the peoples to be Mine.” Hashem has set us aside to be His; that is an inborn trait that we have. Also, we are expected to choose a holy lifestyle in order to “be holy for” Hashem. These two characteristics are meant to set us apart.
R’ Yisraeli adds: We say in Havdalah that Hashem “separates between holy and mundane, light and dark, Yisrael and the nations.” Just as the distinction between light and dark is critical for the world’s existence, so recognizing the distinction between holy and mundane, and recognizing that the Jewish People have a different role than the other nations, is critical to the proper functioning of the world. (Siach Shaul)
********
“You shall take for yourselves on the first day the fruit of a citron tree . . .” (23:40)
R’ Nachman of Breslov z”l (1772-1810; Ukraine) observed: We have no idea how precious this Mitzvah is. The proof of its unique worth is that even people of limited means spend freely on a top-of-the-line Etrog–more so than people do for other Mitzvot. Though we don’t know the reasons for its worth, our souls sense that this is an unusually precious Mitzvah. (Sichot Ha’Ran #125)
********
“Outside the Parochet Ha’edut / Curtain of the Testimony, in the Ohel Mo’ed, Aharon shall arrange it, from evening to morning, before Hashem, continually–an eternal decree for your generations.” (24:3)
The Gemara (Menachot 86a) explains why the Parochet is called the “Curtain of Testimony”: The western light of the Menorah, which was adjacent to the Parochet, testified to mankind that the Shechinah dwells in Yisrael, for the Kohen filled it with the same amount of oil as the other lights, but the other lights all went out in the morning, while the western light continued to burn until evening. [Until here from the Gemara]
R’ Shlomo ben Mordechai z”l (16th century; rabbi of Mezeritch, Poland) asks: Were there no other miracles that testified that the Shechinah dwells in Yisrael–for example, the fact that a fire came down from Heaven to consume the offerings on the Mizbei’ach, or the fact that a Cloud covered the Mishkan so thickly that Moshe could not enter the Tabernacle? [In the Bet Hamikdash, too, there were daily miracles that testified to the presence of the Shechinah. See Pirkei Avot 5:7.] Many of those miracles occurred in the public portions of the Mishkan and Bet Hamikdash, while the western light burned deep inside the Sanctuary, where it was not visible! Moreover, if the burning light was meant to serve as a testimony that the Shechinah dwells in Yisrael, at least it should have been the eastern light, which was the light closest to the public space, not the western light, which was the light closest to the Holy of Holies!
R’ Shlomo answers: The Gemara does not mean that the burning of the western light was a testimony while the Mishkan/Bet Hamikdash stood, for there were many more public miracles that happened in the Temple. Rather, the western light burnt continuously to testify that even after the “sunset” of Jewish independence–the sun sets in the west–after Nevuchadnezar had destroyed the Bet Hamikdash and other empires continued to subdue the Jewish People, the Shechinah would continue to dwell in Yisrael. This would be made particularly evident by a miracle that mimicked the miracle of the western light–i.e., the miracle of Chanukah, which involved the lights of the Menorah burning for longer than they should have done naturally. (Mizbach Ha’zahav, Conclusion)
********
Pirkei Avot
“Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov says, ‘He who does even a single Mitzvah acquires for himself a single Praklit / advocate, and he who transgresses even a single Aveirah / transgression acquires for himself a single accuser’.” (4:13)
R’ Binyamin Hakohen Vitali z”l (1651-1729; rabbi of Reggio, Italy; known as “Rabach”) asks: Why don’t the two parts of the Mishnah use parallel language–for example, saying “does” an Aveirah, just as it says “does” a Mitzvah? He answers:
We read (Vayikra 26:3), “If you will follow My decrees and observe My commandments, Va’asitem otam / and you will do them.” Midrash Vayikra Rabbah comments: Rabbi Chama bar Chanina said, “If you observe the Torah, I will consider it as if Asitem otah / you made it.” Rabbi Chanina bar Pappa said, “If you observe the Torah, I will consider it as if Asitem atzmechem / you made yourselves.” [Until here from the Midrash.]
Rabach explains: The Midrash is commenting on the seemingly superfluous phrase, “Va’asitem otam.” Obviously, one who observes the Torah will “do” what the Torah says. Therefore, the two Sages quoted by the Midrash expound that if one observes the Torah, Hashem will view it as if he “made” the Torah (see below) or “made” himself. (The words “do” and “make” have the same Hebrew root–Ayin, Sin, Heh.) This, continues Rabach, explains why “does” is the appropriate verb to use in connection with a Mitzvah more so than in connection with a transgression.
What does it mean to “make” the Torah? Rabach explains, based on the Zohar: The Mitzvot we are commanded to perform are the physical manifestations of the Torah. However, every Mitzvah has its root in the spiritual world far “above.” Though we can sense only the physical component of a Mitzvah, our Mitzvah performance has effects as well at that spiritual root of the Mitzvah–the place, so-to-speak, where the Mitzvah was “made.”
What does it mean to “make” oneself? Rabach explains: Our Sages teach that the 365 negative commandments and 248 affirmative commandments correspond to the number of limbs and sinews in the human body, as we read (Kohelet 12:13), “The sum of the matter, when all has been considered–have reverence for Elokim and keep His commandments, for that is the whole of man.” Accordingly, when one observes the Torah’s Mitzvot, each Mitzvah benefits one part of his body so that he “makes” himself. In contrast, if a person neglects a particular Mitzvah, it is as if he is missing a part of his body.
Lastly, Rabach notes, the Talmud’s usual word for an “advocate” is “Saneigor.” A “Praklit,” however, is a stronger advocate than a Saneigor. (Ahavat Olam)
********
Shabbat
“Speak to Bnei Yisrael and say to them, ‘Hashem’s appointed festivals that you are to designate as Mikra’ei Kodesh / holy convocations–these are My appointed festivals. For six days labor may be done, and the seventh day is a day of complete rest, Mikra Kodesh / a holy convocation, you shall not do any work; it is a Shabbat for Hashem in all your dwelling places’.” (23:2-3)
Midrash Torat Kohanim asks: What is Shabbat doing among the Festivals (i.e., Pesach, Shavuot, Sukkot, Rosh Hashanah, and Yom Kippur, all of which are discussed in the verses that follow)? The Midrash answers: This teaches that if one profanes the Festivals, it is as if he has profaned Shabbat. Conversely, if one observes the Festivals, it is as if he has observed the Festivals and Shabbat. [Until here from the Midrash]
R’ Nosson Yehuda Leib Mintzberg z”l (1943-2018; rabbi and Rosh Yeshiva in Yerushalayim and Bet Shemesh, Israel) explains: The Festivals are called Mikra’ei Kodesh–literally, “[days] that are called holy”–because they occur only as a result of the Jewish People’s sanctifying the new moon. The Torah identifies the dates when the holidays occur, but we determine when those dates will fall and make them holy by establishing a calendar. But why is Shabbat called “Mikra Kodesh”? Every seventh day is sanctified by G-d from the time of Creation; it does not need us to sanctify it!
Nevertheless, the Torah is teaching, there is a Mitzvah for us to supplement Shabbat’s holiness; we not only must treat it as if it is holy, we also must feel its holiness in our hearts. If one does not sanctify the Festivals, which have no sanctity if the Jewish People does not sanctify them, he certainly will not sanctify Shabbat. If an individual does feel and act holy on the Festivals, says the Midrash, he will sanctify Shabbat as well.
R’ Mintzberg adds: It is this requirement to sanctify Shabbat that makes possible the Mitzvah of Tosefet Shabbat / adding to Shabbat, i.e., bringing in Shabbat at least a few minutes before sunset and ending it at least a few minutes later than the earliest possible time. If Shabbat is sanctified by Hashem from the time of Creation, how can we add to it? Our verse teaches that we are expected to add sanctity to the sanctity that Hashem already bestowed upon the day, and that allows us to add time to Shabbat as well. (Ben Melech Al Ha’Torah)
Go to Torah.org
Date: May 15, 2025