Duke of Wellington
Sir Arthur Wellesley, the 1st Duke of Wellington was the man who defeated Napoleon at Waterloo. He rose to power serving twice as Britain’s Prime Minister and remained Commander-in-Chief of Forces until he died in 1852. But was his political and military prowess to the Jews benefit or detriment?
Once Wellesley became the head of the House of Commons, he refused to support Nathan Meyer Rothschild’s proposal to allow Jews to own property or vote in parliamentary elections. This wouldn’t be his only chance he had to ignore Jewish pleas for equality. In 1830, Rothschild, along with Isaac Goldsmid and Moses Montefiore, introduced a bill to extend all civil rights, privileges, and opportunities for employment to be “opened to Jews.” Wellington refused calls to let party members vote their conscience and the bill was defeated.
Three years later, Wellesley had fallen from his position as Prime Minister but remained in the House of Lords. The bill for Jewish emancipation was proposed again and this time swiftly was passed by the House of Commons. But upon reaching the House of Lords, Wellesley’s reaction has been described by English politician Henry Richard Vassall-Fox, 3rd Baron Holland, as “one of the worst… and most injudicious speeches… every word of it implied or avowed that no relaxation of exclusive laws [against Jews] should ever be made.” The bill was once again defeated and the Jews of England would have to wait another 25 years for the next chance for equality in the United Kingdom.
Once Wellesley became the head of the House of Commons, he refused to support Nathan Meyer Rothschild’s proposal to allow Jews to own property or vote in parliamentary elections. This wouldn’t be his only chance he had to ignore Jewish pleas for equality. In 1830, Rothschild, along with Isaac Goldsmid and Moses Montefiore, introduced a bill to extend all civil rights, privileges, and opportunities for employment to be “opened to Jews.” Wellington refused calls to let party members vote their conscience and the bill was defeated.
Three years later, Wellesley had fallen from his position as Prime Minister but remained in the House of Lords. The bill for Jewish emancipation was proposed again and this time swiftly was passed by the House of Commons. But upon reaching the House of Lords, Wellesley’s reaction has been described by English politician Henry Richard Vassall-Fox, 3rd Baron Holland, as “one of the worst… and most injudicious speeches… every word of it implied or avowed that no relaxation of exclusive laws [against Jews] should ever be made.” The bill was once again defeated and the Jews of England would have to wait another 25 years for the next chance for equality in the United Kingdom.